REZILION VS SCA
See all your risk, patch only what matters, automatically
Traditional SCA tools are limited in what they see, and flood developers with false-positives that slow teams down. Rezilion covers your entire SDLC, filters away un-exploitable vulnerabilities and automatically remediates what matters.
Achieve Full Visibility
SCAs provide limited visibility to 3rd party software used in your dev environment. Rezilion shows you all software - and its associated risk - across the entire SDLC (dev, stage, and production).
Eliminate the Noise
SCAs are notorious for generating massive amounts of false-positives. Rezilion filters these away to focus remediation work on risks that are actually exploitable – saving 85% of patching time.
Remediate Automatically
SCAs flood developers and DevOps with remediation work. Rezilion automatically creates an optimal remediation plan, suggests a fix, and applies it as part of your SDLC.
Save 5X on Costs
SCAs are not only expensive - they come with a high toll of dev time spent patching. Rezilion comes with an attractive pricing model, and helps teams achieve an 85% reduction in dev hours spent on patching.
Compare Rezilion to Traditional SCA Tools
-
- Traditional SCA
What is it?
Discovery
-
Rezilion
End-to-End
Continuous inventory of all your software components, everywhere (cloud, on-prem, windows, and IoT), at any point in the SDLC (dev, stage, and production) – all in one place.
-
Traditional SCA
Partial
Single point-in time scan of 3rd party & Open Source software in dev only
Risk Detection
-
Rezilion
Expanded
All risk associated with 3rd party & Open-source software (including other scanners’ findings)
-
Traditional SCA
CI Only
Vulnerabilities & licenses Only
Aggregation
-
Rezilion
1-click Integration
Aggregates and prioritizes vulnerabilities from all your other scanners to allow effective management from a single pane of glass
-
Traditional SCA
Not Supported
Limited to view one tool/one stage/one environment at a time
Prioritization
-
Rezilion
Continuous
Validates exploitability with runtime analysis, resulting in 85% reduction in remediation work
-
Traditional SCA
Noisy
Has many false-positives. Can’t differentiate what’s actually being executed in runtime
Remediation
-
Rezilion
Automated
Builds an optimal remediation plan, automatically executes it in dev (creates MRs), opens and tracks tickets in stage/production
-
Traditional SCA
Manual
Tells developer what vulnerabilities they have to fix
SBOM Reporting
-
Rezilion
Expanded
Multiple formats, including CycloneDX and VEX. Effectively communicates risk to customers and auditors – while saving time on vulnerabilities that don’t have an actual impact
-
Traditional SCA
Limited
Limited support SBOM formats such as CycloneDX. Most don’t support VEX
Exposure
Average Cost
-
Rezilion
Efficient (5X Lower TCO)
Sample pricing:
$35 (license) + 1.5h (patch time) X
$50 (dev hour cost) = $110
-
Traditional SCA
Expensive
Sample pricing:
$75 (license) + 10h (patch time) X
$50 (dev hour cost) = $575
Get the guide to Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Whether you’re new to SCA or considering a change to your existing solution, get the facts on how SCA works, what security issues to consider, and what to look for in choosing a provider in this free, comprehensive guide.
